The 12 Oversight Board Facebook Robertson ad describes itself as a “part of a collective effort” to “steer Facebook towards greater transparency” and that it’s “limited in its powers to combat fake and misleading content.” But its response to the leak is just one piece of a bigger picture that includes the influence of other powerful actors.
Describes itself as a “part” of a “collective effort” to steer Facebook towards greater transparency
The world wide web has transformed the way we consume information. It has displaced old media companies and created new ones. Web 2.0 has given us the ability to connect with likeminded folks.
While the web has undoubtedly changed the way we communicate, the Internet also created powerful business models. In the private sector, the likes of Google, Amazon, eBay, and Craigslist have learned how to harness the power of users.
One of the most successful Web applications has been Twitter, the microblogging network that allows for anyone with a computer to send and receive status updates. As a result, Twitter has become an increasingly popular social networking platform. Unlike Facebook, which requires users to sign up before they can post, Twitter is open to all. However, Twitter does have an extra step to make a tweet private.
For organizations considering launching a campaign on the web, a smart move would be to take the time to understand the various risks and vulnerabilities that can occur. To mitigate these threats, organizers should implement a robust risk assessment program that focuses on the most critical activities. Some of the most important tasks include developing a strong organizational culture, identifying and addressing risks and vulnerabilities before they become a real problem, and keeping an eye on management tactics and strategies that could jeopardize organizational goals.
Reacts to the Leak
There have been numerous reactions to the Facebook Oversight Board Facebook page leaks. A number of these reactions have included the call for the Oversight Board to be an independent court. Others have called the Oversight Board a quasi-judicial institution. However, while the Oversight Board is an important ad hoc committee that helps to hold Facebook accountable, it is not a judicial body. It is a private corporation funded by a single entity, and is a relatively small piece of Facebook’s overall corporate fact-finding.
Moreover, the Oversight Board does not have the power to comment on Facebook’s algorithms. Rather, it deals with a narrow slice of appeals to content decisions. Whether or not the board is effective depends on whether it can effectively provoke a genuine change in Facebook’s corporate practices.
Although the Oversight Board has the capacity to intervene when it believes that Facebook has misjudged a situation, the board’s power to do so is extremely limited. For example, the board was not able to review or comment on the infamous Russian leaks.
Facebook recently announced the Oversight Board (FOB). The board is a new institution tasked with addressing issues of online freedom of expression.
While the Board’s powers and responsibilities have been outlined in a brief essay, it is not clear what kind of cases it will be able to review or how it will go about its work. It may rely on outside experts to perform research and provide a written report.